TTG AI is an AI-powered trading and investing platform, built on our own model, MARI,
and our own agent runtime, BRIAN.
MARI is the model behind ttg.ai and the MARI desktop app.
| Base | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, fine-tuned by TTG for behavior only, on real member conversations with no personal information |
| Works from | Live market data, a full trading day of context and live market tools, as one multimodal model |
| Runs on | BRIAN, our open-source agent runtime ยท NVIDIA B300 GPUs on RunPod ยท our own router on Cloudflare |
~180Btotal parameters, sparse mixture-of-experts |
6Bparameters active per token |
262,144tokens of context in a single conversation |
100+market tools MARI can call |
On long, multi-step agentic work, MARI's base model is level with OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna and GPT-5.6 Terra and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8, with only 6B active parameters, on infrastructure we run.
| Agents' Last Exam | MARI (base) | GPT-6 Luna | GPT-5.6 Terra | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-running professional work across 55 fields score | 51.2 | 50.9 | 50.4 | 45.2 |
Why it matters for us. Agents' Last Exam grades an agent on long, multi-step jobs, scored on how much of the work it gets right. That is what MARI does for every member: pull quotes, order flow, options flow and news, check the member's saved rules and live chart, and turn it into a trade plan. Doing it with 6B active parameters is what makes each answer fast and lets us run the model ourselves.
Sources: MARI, the published results for its base model, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, before fine-tuning. GPT-6 Luna (max effort): OpenAI, Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna. GPT-5.6 Terra and Claude Opus 4.8, as reported by OpenAI: OpenAI, GPT-5.6. Each lab ran its own test setup, so treat gaps under about a point as a tie. Agents' Last Exam is reported two ways: the partial-credit score above, which is the metric OpenAI publishes, and a stricter pass@1 that counts only fully solved tasks (MARI: 24.3, in the Benchmarks table below). On that stricter pass rate, MARI's base trails GPT-5.6 Terra (28.0) and Claude Opus 4.8 (27.0), and newer flagships such as Claude Opus 5.5 score higher on both measures.
Measured on our production fleet during the US market open, Monday Nov 2, 2026 (9:24โ10:27 ET). Real member traffic.
8,616requests in the first hour of trading |
280โ334 tok/ssingle-request speed per pod |
6.3 smedian time to a full answer |
99.6%of requests completed without error |
Published scores for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, the base model MARI is fine-tuned from, next to three other models. The fine-tune targets behavior, not capability, so these are the scores MARI starts from. Each lab reports its own scores from its own test setup. Bold marks the best score in each row, and โ marks where MARI's base beats every other published score in that row.
| What it tests | MARI (base) | Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agents and tools | ||||
| Real-world tool use Toolathlon Verified, pass@1 | 73.5 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Multimodal tool use ClawEval-MM, average | 60.4 โ | 54.7 | n/a | n/a |
| Professional job tasks JobBench | 55.7 โ | 36.6 | n/a | n/a |
| Frontier agentic tasks Agents' Last Exam, pass@1 | 24.3 | n/a | 35.4 | 26.3 |
| Reasoning and following instructions | ||||
| Instruction following IFBench | 81.3 โ | 62.5 | n/a | n/a |
| Graduate-level science GPQA Diamond | 91.7 โ | 91.3 | n/a | n/a |
| Hardest exam questions Humanity's Last Exam | 35.9 | 40.0 | 42.6 | n/a |
| Coding | ||||
| Competitive coding LiveCodeBench v6 | 91.9 โ | 88.8 | n/a | n/a |
| Agentic coding SWE-bench Pro* | 62.5 โ | 53.4 | n/a | n/a |
| Agentic coding DeepSWE v1.1 | 58.7 | n/a | 77.0 | 63.4 |
| Repo-level code generation NL2Repo-Bench | 48.1 | 47.6 | 68.2 | n/a |
| Vision | ||||
| Scientific chart analysis CharXiv (RQ) | 84.6 โ | 66.0 | n/a | n/a |
| Visual math MathVision | 90.6 โ | 65.5 | n/a | n/a |
| Real-world perception RealWorldQA | 88.5 โ | 73.9 | n/a | n/a |
| Long video understanding LVBench | 76.6 โ | 63.0 | n/a | n/a |
| Size | ||||
| Parameters active per token | 6B โ | undisclosed | 8Bโ16B | 18B |
n/a means that model has no published score on that benchmark. * MARI's SWE-bench Pro score was run on a corrected version of the task set; Claude Opus 4.6's is its official score.
Spot checks at serving precision. Third-party spot checks of the base model compressed to the same 4-bit format MARI is served in: thinking on, auto-scored with no LLM judge, on samples of each benchmark (MMLU-Pro 200 questions, MATH-500 100, GSM8K 100, BFCL v4 30), so treat each as accurate to a few points:
89.0MMLU-Pro |
86.0MATH-500 |
97.0GSM8K |
96.7BFCL v4 tool calling |
It's built to use tools. Every MARI answer can pull live quotes, order flow, options flow and news. At serving precision, the base model scores 96.7 on a 30-question BFCL v4 tool-calling sample, and the base model's published scores are 73.5 on real-world tool use and 60.4 on multimodal tool use, ahead of Claude Opus 4.6's 54.7.
It handles long, multi-step work. Its base model's Agents' Last Exam score (51.2) puts it level with GPT-6 Luna and GPT-5.6 Terra and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (45.2). That benchmark grades the same shape of work as a member's trade plan: many steps, many tools, one deliverable.
It does what you ask. Its base model scores 81.3 on instruction following against Claude Opus 4.6's 62.5. A trading plan has to respect the member's exact rules, size and risk.
It's fast because it's small where it counts. Only 6B parameters fire per token, a third of GLM-5.3-Flash's 18B. That is why a single pod writes 280โ334 tok/s and the fleet handled 8,616 requests in the first hour of trading.
It's ours. MARI is built on an open-weight model, carries our own fine-tune and runs on dedicated GPUs under our control. No AI vendor can change, throttle or retire it under us.
Where others lead, and whether it matters. (MARI's numbers here are its base model's published scores.)
MARI's strengths line up with the job: using tools, following instructions and long multi-step work, with only 6B active parameters.
MARI doesn't rely on stale training data. As it works, it pulls real-time data through BRIAN from TTG's own data layer, powered by Nasdaq, Databento, Massive (formerly Polygon.io), Benzinga, Unusual Whales and more: close to 300 live data endpoints across every major asset class, which MARI reaches through its tools.
Level 3 order flow (NL3). A continuous order-by-order stream of the US stock and ETF book: every order added, canceled and filled, as it happens. TTG's engine flags institutional-size orders and powers the Flow Monitor, so MARI sees where size is actually stepping in at a price, not just the last trade.
Stocks. Trades, NBBO quotes, snapshots, gainers and losers, intraday and daily bars, SMA, EMA, MACD and RSI, short interest and short volume, float, splits and dividends, full financial statements, SEC filings including 10-K sections and risk factors, the IPO calendar, and market status and holidays.
Options and options flow. Chains, contract snapshots, trades, quotes, bars and technicals, plus flow analytics: unusual-flow alerts, flow by strike and expiry, gamma and greek exposure (including minute-by-minute spot GEX), max pain, IV rank, IV term structure and skew, open-interest changes, net premium and NOPE, and the day's hottest chains.
Off-exchange and tape. Dark-pool prints, lit-market block prints and the price levels where off-exchange volume is building.
Market-wide positioning. Market, sector and ETF options "tide", net flow by expiry, top net-impact tickers, total options volume and cross-asset correlations.
Ownership and insiders. Institutional holdings and activity, insider buys and sells, congressional trades, and ETF holdings, flows and exposure.
Futures. Contract snapshots, quotes, trades and bars, contract and product specs, trading schedules and automatic front-month resolution.
Indices, forex and crypto. Snapshots, quotes and trades, bars, top movers, technicals and currency conversion.
News and analysts. Breaking headlines filterable by ticker, sentiment and impact, AI summaries with a trading takeaway, analyst ratings, price targets, consensus and bull/bear cases, corporate guidance and events, the FDA calendar, and earnings and dividend calendars.
Macro. CPI and PCE, inflation expectations, Treasury yields, fed funds, SOFR and repo rates, labor-market data and the economic calendar.
Prediction markets. Event odds and their price history: what the crowd is pricing for the Fed, CPI, elections and more.
Screeners and scans. Stock and short-interest screeners, TTG's triangle-pattern scan and a support/resistance engine.
Web. Web and news search, and reading any page as clean text.
TTG's own desk. Moderator trade alerts and chat, the day's watchlists and analyst announcements, the member's tier, credits and course progress, and Holy Grail trade-plan runs, including the Level 3 Flow Monitor.
โก Real-time toolsMarket data is real-time: Level 3 order flow, options flow, dark-pool prints, quotes, futures, indices, forex, crypto, news and prediction-market odds. Reference data (filings, ownership, analyst ratings, macro releases) is as current as its publisher's latest release. All of it is wired in as live tools, not stale training data. |
๐ค Agentic tradingAgents that scan, research and build trade plans, made for traders who want an edge, not a chatbot. |
๐ Open weightsWe build on open-weight models and serve them on dedicated GPUs we control. Fast, private, and ours to tune. |
๐ ๏ธ MCP-nativeEvery capability ships as a tool any agent can call. |
Interests: automated & algorithmic trading ยท quantitative finance ยท market intelligence ยท autonomous agents ยท long-context reasoning ยท tool use ยท open-weight inference
MARI provides market research and education, not investment advice. TTG AI and its owners and employees are not registered broker-dealers or investment advisers. Consult a licensed professional before making trading decisions.